Process Documentation Template: A Guide Your Teammate Can Use
“Open the ticket and assign it to the right team.”
That instruction makes sense to the person who wrote it. A new teammate has questions. Which ticket? Where do they find the right team? What should they do when the customer's account is missing?
A useful process document answers those questions at the point someone needs the answer. This template gives you a place to capture them, along with the steps, owner, and checks that keep the instructions usable after the first handover.
Download the template and completed example
- Download the blank process documentation template for Word.
- Download the completed support-ticket example for Word.
- Prefer plain text? Open the blank Markdown template or the completed Markdown example and copy it into your documentation tool.
You can edit the Word files directly or import them into Google Docs. Both downloads are available without a signup. The completed example uses fictional training data and routing rules; adapt them to your team's process.
What belongs in a process document?
A process document explains how a repeatable piece of work gets done. For a task such as routing a support request, a short SOP with numbered steps may be enough. A larger process that crosses departments may need several task guides and a diagram showing the handoffs.
Start with one task that somebody else should be able to finish. Use the template to answer these questions:
| Part of the document | What the reader needs to know |
|---|---|
| Purpose and result | What will be different when the task is finished? |
| Start and scope | When should I use this guide, and which cases does it cover? |
| Owner | Who can answer a question or approve a change? |
| Before you start | Which access, information, or earlier work do I need? |
| Steps and decisions | What do I do, and how do I choose the next action? |
| Exceptions | When should I stop or ask for help? |
| Completion check | How do I confirm the work was saved and reached the right person? |
| Review and changes | When was this checked, and what will trigger the next review? |
For each step, write the action and the result you expect to see. “Select Save; confirm the new team appears on the ticket” gives the reader a way to catch a mistake.
A completed process documentation example
Here is a shortened version of the support-ticket example in the download. The screen labels and routing rules are illustrative, so you can see how the pieces fit together without needing a particular help-desk product.
Process: route a new support ticket
Purpose: Put a new request with the team that can handle it, while preserving the context the next person needs.
Start: A new ticket appears in the Unassigned queue.
Scope: Ordinary product-use and billing questions from existing customer accounts. Follow your team's separate incident process for suspected security issues or widespread outages.
Owner: Support lead. The teammate reviewing the queue performs the task; the receiving team takes over after assignment.
Before you start: You need permission to view and assign tickets, access to the account directory, and the team's current routing rules.
Step 1: identify the account and request
Open the oldest new ticket in Unassigned. Read the message and check the account against the customer directory. If you can't identify the account, leave an internal note and ask the support lead to review it before routing.
Step 2: look for an existing conversation
Check the account's open tickets for the same request. If one already exists, follow the duplicate-ticket procedure and link the records. Continue with this guide when the ticket represents a new request.
Step 3: apply the routing rule
In this example, product-use questions go to Product Support, billing questions go to Billing, and unclear requests go to the support lead for review. Choose the team using the request itself; an urgent-sounding subject line isn't enough to classify it.
Your real guide should link to the team's maintained routing rules. If you copy those rules into several documents, somebody will have to keep every copy current.
Step 4: leave context and save the assignment
Add an internal note with a short description of the request, any relevant existing ticket, and the reason for the route. Choose the receiving team and save. Follow your team's policy for messages visible to the customer; the example note is internal.
Step 5: check the result
Confirm that the receiving team appears on the ticket and the note was saved. Check that the ticket appears in that team's queue. If saving fails, leave it available for review and contact the support lead; an attempted assignment doesn't complete the handoff.
The task is complete when: the right team owns the ticket, the context is saved, and the receiving queue shows the request.
Review trigger: The support lead checks this document when routing rules, ticket fields, or team responsibilities change, and when readers repeatedly ask the same question.
Notice how much of the useful information sits outside the numbered clicks: scope, the duplicate rule, the person to ask, and the final check. Those details make the guide usable when the expert is unavailable.
How to document your own process
1. Pick a task with a clear start and finish
“Train the support team” is too broad for one task guide. “Route a new support ticket” has a trigger and an outcome you can check.
Choose work that repeats, causes questions, or depends on one person's memory. If a colleague is preparing a handover, ask which tasks somebody will have to do during their first week without that colleague.
2. Walk through the real task and explain your choices
Use a training account or suitable example data. Go through the task in the order you actually perform it. If you record the walkthrough, narrate the reasoning a new person would otherwise miss.
For the ticket example, useful narration would sound like this:
“Before I choose a team, I check whether this account already has an open ticket about the same issue. If it does, I follow our duplicate-ticket procedure. For a new product-use question, I select Product Support, leave an internal note explaining the request, and save. Then I check the receiving queue.”
That gives a writer the decision, action, and verification to work with. A recording that only shows the cursor moving may leave the reason for a choice unexplained.
3. Turn the walkthrough into a draft
You can write the steps directly in the template. If you already have a recording, the video-to-SOP workflow can help create an editable draft from it.
Here's how the explanation above becomes instructions:
| What the expert explains | What the guide should contain |
|---|---|
| “I check whether there's already an open ticket.” | A duplicate check before routing, with the next action for either result |
| “I select Product Support for this kind of question.” | The routing rule and a link to the maintained source |
| “I leave a note and save.” | The fields to update, the context to include, and the save action |
| “Then I check the receiving queue.” | A completion check that verifies the handoff |
Review a generated draft against the source recording and the current process. Add prerequisites, decisions, or exceptions that were never explained aloud. The filled-in download is an editorial example of the finished document, rather than a measured output from a product test.
4. Put a screenshot where it answers a question
A screenshot earns its place when it helps somebody find a control, recognize a state, or check a result. Add a caption explaining what to notice. Keep customer information out of training examples and apply your team's sharing rules.
You don't need a screenshot for every mouse movement. A clear image of the assignment field may teach more than several nearly identical captures.
5. Ask a teammate to follow it
Give the draft to somebody who hasn't performed the task. Ask them to work from the instructions and tell you where they get stuck. If you have to explain a decision in a message, add that explanation to the guide.
Check the finish as well as the steps. In the example, choosing a team wasn't enough: the ticket had to appear in the receiving queue. A reader should be able to verify the outcome without asking the author.
6. Publish one maintained version
Put the guide where the team already looks for instructions, and give it an owner who can keep it current. Add the source recording if it provides useful context. When a process changes, update the guide and replace links to retired copies.
Choose review triggers that match the work. A new field in the help desk, a changed routing rule, or a teammate's repeated question can all tell you the guide needs attention.
Adapt the template for onboarding or a handover
For onboarding, tell the new hire when they'll need the process, what access they need first, and who will review their first attempt. Link related task guides in the order they're needed.
For a handover, add the recurring schedule, open work, and the next owner. Record the explanation while the current owner is still available, then have the person taking over try the task. Their questions are useful material for the document.
Start with a process your team will repeat soon. Download the template, document that task, and let the next person show you what still needs explaining.
About the team
Related Articles
5 Scribe Alternatives for Teams Documenting Internal Work
Compare Scribe alternatives for recording processes, writing SOPs, and training teammates. Choose by the work you need to document, with current source links.
5 Tango Alternatives for Internal Process Guides and Training
Compare Tango alternatives for written guides, process recordings, narrated video, and employee training. Find the right fit for the work your team documents.
Scribe vs Tango: Which SOP Tool Is Better in 2026?
Scribe vs Tango compared side-by-side on features, pricing, and limits. See which SOP tool fits your team and discover a free alternative.